Forcing a woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy violates her bodily integrity and aggravates mental trauma, and the MTP Act does not require the husband's consent for termination...

Statutory restrictions under Section 45 PMLA cannot supersede the constitutional right to speedy trial, and economic offences cannot be classified as a homogeneous class to deny bail solely ..

Directed the DGP to issue SOP for mandatory audio-video recording of search and seizure, with disciplinary proceedings for non-compliance with Section 105 BNSS...

The Trial Court failed to give effect to the legislative intent underlying the proviso to Section 437(1) CrPC which recognises women accused as a distinct class in matters of bail in non-bai..

To attract abetment of suicide, instigation must be in close proximity to suicide and should put the victim in a position where she would have no other option but to commit suicide -- In Law..

Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC creates an explicit bar against taking cognizance of offences related to court proceedings unless the court formally presents a written complaint...

When pedestrians and cattle are moving on the road, the driver is required to slow down and drive with caution; failure to do so constitutes negligence...

The petitioner had prima facie established his identity as an Indian citizen based on documents and passport issued by competent authority, and there was no further requirement to keep him i..

Where the registered owner is one of the accused from whom contraband was recovered, interim release of the vehicle is not permissible as per Supreme Court guidelines...

A working mother shoulders the "dual burden" of professional obligations and primary caregiving, which cannot be monetarily quantified, and the father's obligation does not diminish merely b..

A Sessions Court having jurisdiction to decide an anticipatory bail application is duty-bound to adjudicate the same on merits by either allowing or rejecting it, and cannot dispose of such ..

An order passed under Section 156(3) CrPC is an interlocutory order and cannot be challenged in revision under Section 397(2) CrPC at the instance of a person against whom neither cognizance..