CaseLawToday.com
Relevant Case Law, Every Day.
Supreme Court & High Courts Judgments
Merely for explaining the medical terminologies, the expert witness cannot be recalled..
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Witness of plaintiff who was not allowed to be examined during plaintiff evidence cannot be allowed in rebuttal evidence ..
In earlier four daughter were mentioned as legal heirs--In subsequent only two daughter were mentioned--Will discarded..
Supreme Court
It would not apply if the proceedings were collusive in nature to defeat the rights of susbsequent purchaser with aid of original owner..
Parat Patwar could not have been read into evidence in the absence of Parat Sarkar, which in fact is the original mutation
Second Appeal--Nature of Documents--Wherever the issue relates..
Objection that application was filed after 3 years not tenable..
Application under O.7 R.11 CPC was dismissed for non affixing of ad valorem Court fee--Revision against said order is not maintainable
Court Fees--Suit for Joint Possession--Ad valorem ..
Order not to be remanded merely on the ground that proper opportunity to cross-examine two witnesses was not granted..
None of the clauses in agreement deals with handing over the possession of premises from owner in favour of occupant--Agreement held to be a leave and license agreement and not lease agreeme..
Couple living separately for about last 25 years--Husband is working in a public sector undertaking--Husband directed to pay Rs 25 lakhs over and above deposited earlier..
It is not the requirement that the additional evidence sought to be produced should be reproduced in the application itself
Additional Evidence in Appeal--Dismissal from Service--State ..
Treating doctor observed that patient was grossly intoxicated--However, no test was conducted to determine that the alcohol content was more than permissible limit of 30 mg per 100 ml--Claim..
CaseLawToday.com is powered by M/s Law Herald Infotech